Neocloud Brief · neocloud stocks · what is a neocloud · neocloud ETF
Corrections & clarifications
Every factual revision we make to a published page is logged here, with the date and the source that settled it. We do not silently edit numbers.
01The 30-second read
How we handle corrections
Research is a record of what was known at a point in time — but when a fact turns out to be wrong, the fix belongs in public, not in a quiet edit.
So: when a published figure is corrected, the page is updated and the change is logged here with its date and the source that settled it. Figures we cannot verify are either left out or labelled as third-party or unverified claims. If a number came from an aggregator and the primary source disagrees, the primary source wins.
02The log
2026
DRAM — holdings count corrected from 17 to 24. The page had carried an aggregator-sourced count. The fund’s own page shows 24 holdings. Corrected in the same pass: listing venue (Cboe BZX, previously shown as “BATS”), price ($59.11 → $59.61), AUM (~$26.1B → $25.86B), and since-inception return (a range → +161.51% as of 30 Jun 2026). A top-ten holdings table, previously missing, was added. Source: roundhillinvestments.com/etf/dram. See the DRAM page.
2026
Neocloud ETF — “17 memory names” corrected to 24 in the comparison table, so it matches the verified fund data. See the neocloud ETF page.
2026
Neocloud stocks — FAQ corrected: a pure-play neocloud ETF does exist. The page previously stated that none existed. Roundhill’s NCLD launched 6 August 2026; the FAQ was rewritten and now links the new neocloud ETF page. See the neocloud stocks page.
2026
Clarification — Core Scientific (CORZ) market cap. Our coverage research initially cited ~$11.2B for CORZ. That was a fully diluted figure reported in May 2026; verification put the figure at ~$5.8B as of 18 Sep 2026, after a sharp decline in the share price. The published CORZ page has only ever used the verified figure. Logged here because research notes can outlive the page that supersedes them.
03What triggers an entry
We log it
- A published number changes because a primary source contradicted what we printed
- A factual claim is withdrawn — for example, “no such fund exists”
- A figure is re-scoped — basic shares vs fully diluted, GAAP vs adjusted, point-in-time vs average
- Something we said in research never published but could be repeated elsewhere is corrected in the open
We don’t log it
- Price moves. Prices change every day; that is not a correction
- Analyst targets being revised — that is news, not an error
- Estimates that were labelled as estimates and turned out differently
- Styling, layout, and typo fixes that don’t change meaning
04Method & disclosure
Corrections are sourced to primary documents where they exist — a fund’s own page, a company filing, a press release. Where only third-party aggregators are available, the figure is labelled as such, and the fact that aggregators disagree is itself disclosed rather than averaged away. Where a figure cannot be verified at all, it is either left out or explicitly marked unverified.
This log begins in September 2026, when the site was launched. Entries are added in reverse-chronological order, dated to the day the correction was published.
Sources & method
- Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) fund page — holdings count, AUM, expense ratio, listing venue, price and since-inception performance, read 18 Sep 2026
- Roundhill Neocloud ETF (NCLD) fund page and launch coverage for the 6 Aug 2026 inception date
- Core Scientific (CORZ) market data as of 18 Sep 2026; the May 2026 fully diluted figure as reported at the time